PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Russian Democratization Assistance Act of 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 4, 1999

Russian Democratization Assistance Act of 1999 - Declares it shall be the policy of the United States toward the Russian Federation to: (1) promote and strengthen democratic government and civil society; (2) expand already existing educational and professional exchanges toward those ends; and (3) consider the feasibility of a Russia-based, internationally funded Foundation for Democracy to further democratic government and civil society. Allocates amounts (out of those amounts for support for the independent states of the former Soviet Union under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961) for specified international informational and educational exchange programs for the Russian Federation. Authorizes the President to study the feasibility of establishing a foundation for the promotion of democratic institutions in the Russian Federation. Expresses the sense of Congress that such foundation should be known as the Starovoitova Foundation for Russian Democracy in honor of the former member of the State Duma who was assassinated in St. Petersburg in November 1998. Authorizes appropriations. Authorizes appropriations to carry out the Edmund S. Muskie Fellowship Program with the Russian Federation.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Biden, Joseph R., Jr. [D-DE] · D–DE

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

    2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1268-1270)

    3. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.372 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.372 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.372 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.372 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources