Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 4, 1999
Russian Democratization Assistance Act of 1999 - Declares it shall be the policy of the United States toward the Russian Federation to: (1) promote and strengthen democratic government and civil society; (2) expand already existing educational and professional exchanges toward those ends; and (3) consider the feasibility of a Russia-based, internationally funded Foundation for Democracy to further democratic government and civil society. Allocates amounts (out of those amounts for support for the independent states of the former Soviet Union under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961) for specified international informational and educational exchange programs for the Russian Federation. Authorizes the President to study the feasibility of establishing a foundation for the promotion of democratic institutions in the Russian Federation. Expresses the sense of Congress that such foundation should be known as the Starovoitova Foundation for Russian Democracy in honor of the former member of the State Duma who was assassinated in St. Petersburg in November 1998. Authorizes appropriations. Authorizes appropriations to carry out the Edmund S. Muskie Fellowship Program with the Russian Federation.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.372 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.372 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.372 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.372 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.