PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to require the submittal to Congress of any Presidential Daily Briefing relating to Iraq during the period beginning on January 20, 1997, and ending on March 19, 2003.

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 514.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 11, 2006

Requires the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to submit to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence any Presidential Daily Briefing, or any portion of a Briefing, of the Director of Central Intelligence during the period January 20, 1997-March 19, 2003, that refers to Iraq or otherwise addresses Iraq in any fashion.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [D-MA] · D–MA

Committees

    0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

      Actions

      A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

      1. Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 514.

      2. Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

      3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S7336)

      4. Introduced in Senate

      Bill text & related measures

      Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

      Related bills identified by Congress.gov

      Source last updated: Jan 11, 2023. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

      Explore the bill from different angles

      Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

      Neutral evidence review

      Objective

      Analyze S.3637 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

      View full prompt & sources
      Fairness and public impact

      Progressive lens

      Examine S.3637 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

      View full prompt & sources
      Institutions and government scope

      Conservative lens

      Examine S.3637 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

      View full prompt & sources
      Individual rights and government power

      Liberty lens

      Examine S.3637 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

      View full prompt & sources