PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to correct an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in interest.

Became Private Law No: 106-1.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 3, 1999

Directs the Secretary of the Interior to transfer certain property in Big Horn County, Wyoming, to two named individuals.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Enzi, Michael B. [R-WY] · R–WY

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Private Law No: 106-1.

  2. Became Private Law No: 106-1.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On passage Passed without objection.

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

  10. Considered from the Private Calendar.

  11. Called up from the Private Calendar for consideration.

  12. Placed on the Private Calendar, Calendar No. 5.

  13. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-225.

  14. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-225.

  15. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  16. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  18. Held at the desk.

  19. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  20. Received in the House.

  21. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  22. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  23. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 67.

  24. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 106-29.

  25. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 106-29.

  26. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, OMB.

  27. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  28. Referred to Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands.

  29. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  30. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.361 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.361 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.361 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.361 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources