PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1998

Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 601, papers are returned to the Senate.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 26, 1997

Rhino and Tiger Product Labeling Act - Amends the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to make it unlawful for persons to import into, or export from, the United States any product labeled as containing any listed endangered or threatened species of fish or wildlife (especially rhino and tiger).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Jeffords, James M. [R-VT] · R–VT

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
11 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 601, papers are returned to the Senate.

  2. Held at the desk.

  3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  4. Received in the House.

  5. Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.

  6. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.

  7. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12087-12089)

  8. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 519.

  9. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 105-282.

  10. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 105-282.

  11. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  12. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-840.

  13. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  14. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1660-1661)

  15. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.361 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.361 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.361 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.361 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources