PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program Act

Became Public Law No: 110-391.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Oct 10, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program Act - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the special immigrant program for non-minister religious workers until March 6, 2009.

Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to issue final regulations to eliminate or reduce fraud in the special immigrant non-minister religious worker program not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act.

Directs the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security to report to Congress on such regulations' effectiveness by March 6, 2009.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT

Committees

    0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

      Actions

      A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

      1. Became Public Law No: 110-391.

      2. Became Public Law No: 110-391.

      3. Signed by President.

      4. Signed by President.

      5. Presented to President.

      6. Presented to President.

      7. Cleared for White House.

      8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

      9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H10265-10266)

      10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H10265-10266)

      11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 3606.

      12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10265-10266)

      13. Ms. Lofgren, Zoe moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

      14. Held at the desk.

      15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

      16. Received in the House.

      17. Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9573-9574; text as passed Senate: CR S9573-9574)

      18. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9573-9574; text as passed Senate: CR S9573-9574)

      19. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9668-9669)

      20. Introduced in Senate

      Bill text & related measures

      Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

      Related bills identified by Congress.gov

      Source last updated: May 17, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

      Explore the bill from different angles

      Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

      Neutral evidence review

      Objective

      Analyze S.3606 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

      View full prompt & sources
      Fairness and public impact

      Progressive lens

      Examine S.3606 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

      View full prompt & sources
      Institutions and government scope

      Conservative lens

      Examine S.3606 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

      View full prompt & sources
      Individual rights and government power

      Liberty lens

      Examine S.3606 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

      View full prompt & sources