PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 28, 2016
Veteran Overmedication Prevention Act of 2016
This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to contract with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (or another private, not-for-profit entity with comparable expertise) to review the deaths of all covered veterans who died by suicide during the last five years.
The review shall include:
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
the total numbers of veterans who died by a violent death or by an accidental death during such period;
each veteran's age, gender, race, and ethnicity;
a list of medications and substances prescribed to such veterans, as annotated on toxicology reports;
a summary of medical diagnoses by VA physicians that led to such prescriptions in cases of anxiety and depressive disorders;
the number of instances in which such a veteran was concurrently on multiple medications prescribed by VA physicians;
the number of such veterans who were not taking any VA-prescribed medication;
the percentage of such veterans treated for anxiety or depressive disorders who received a non-medication first-line treatment compared to the percentage who received medication only;
the number of instances in which a non-medication first-line treatment was attempted and deemed ineffective which led to prescribing medication;
descriptions of how the VA determines and updates clinical practice guidelines for prescribing medications and of VA efforts to maintain appropriate staffing levels for mental health professionals;
the percentage of such veterans with combat experience or related trauma;
identification of VA medical facilities with markedly high prescription rates and suicide rates for treated veterans;
an analysis of VA programs that collaborate with state Medicaid agencies and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services;
an analysis of VA medical center collaboration with medical examiners' offices or local jurisdictions to determine veteran mortality and cause of death;
identification of a best practice model to collect and share veteran death certificate data;
an assessment of any apparent patterns based on the review; and
recommendations to improve the safety and well-being of veterans.
The VA shall ensure that such data is compiled in a manner that allows it to be analyzed across all data fields for purposes of informing and updating VA clinical practice guidelines.
A "covered veteran" means any veteran who received VA hospital care or medical services during the five-year period preceding the veteran's death.
People & committees
Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 12, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3410 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3410 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3410 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3410 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.