PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act of 2008

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8017-8019)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 28, 2008

Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act of 2008 - Directs the Attorney General to designate a Deputy Chief in the Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ). Makes the Deputy Chief responsible for investigating and prosecuting violations of criminal civil rights statutes in which the alleged violation occurred before January 1, 1970 and resulted in death.

Directs the Attorney General to designate a Supervisory Special Agent in the Civil Rights Unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the DOJ to investigate violations of criminal civil rights statutes that occurred before January 1, 1970, and resulted in a death.

Authorizes the Attorney General to award grants to state or local law enforcement agencies for the investigation and prosecution of such cases.

Amends the Crime Control Act of 1990 to authorize staff of an Inspector General to assist the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children by conducting reviews of inactive case files to develop recommendations for further investigations and engaging in similar activities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Coburn, Tom [R-OK] · R–OK

Committees

    0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

      Actions

      A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

      1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8017-8019)

      2. Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 921.

      3. Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

      4. Introduced in Senate

      Bill text & related measures

      Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

      Related bills identified by Congress.gov

      Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

      Explore the bill from different angles

      Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

      Neutral evidence review

      Objective

      Analyze S.3348 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

      View full prompt & sources
      Fairness and public impact

      Progressive lens

      Examine S.3348 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

      View full prompt & sources
      Institutions and government scope

      Conservative lens

      Examine S.3348 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

      View full prompt & sources
      Individual rights and government power

      Liberty lens

      Examine S.3348 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

      View full prompt & sources