PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to provide for the rehabilitation of historic structures within the Sandy Hook Unit of Gateway National Recreation Area in the State of New Jersey, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 103-26.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 4, 1993

Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an agreement with the Monmouth County Vocational School District to permit the use by the District of specified properties for the purpose of developing and operating, without cost to the National Park Service (NPS), a secondary school program to be known as the Marine Academy of Science and Technology. Sets forth provisions with respect to: (1) reversion of properties that are not used by the District for a secondary school program; (2) rehabilitation of other property for park uses; and (3) reimbursement of expenses. Requires the Director to collect and retain reasonable fees for services provided to the District by NPS.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 103-26.

    2. Became Public Law No: 103-26.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 410 - 0 (Roll no. 137).

      House roll call 137 · Individual votes
    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 410 - 0 (Roll no. 137).

      House roll call 137 · Individual votes
    10. Considered as unfinished business. (CR H1924-1925)

    11. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 5, rule I, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

    12. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    13. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1917-1918)

    14. Mr. Vento moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    15. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 24.

    16. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-54.

    17. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-54.

    18. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    20. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.

    21. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    22. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

    23. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    24. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    25. Received in the House.

    26. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3039)

    27. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S3039)

    28. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 29.

    29. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston without amendment. With written report No. 103-15.

    30. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston without amendment. With written report No. 103-15.

    31. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    32. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.

    33. Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.

    34. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    35. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1414)

    36. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.328 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.328 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.328 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.328 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources