PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Stop Excessive Energy Speculation Act of 2008

Motion by Senator Reid to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the measure was not invoked (Record Vote Number 184) entered in Senate. (consideration: CR S7436)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 15, 2008

Stop Excessive Energy Speculation Act of 2008 - Amends the Commodity Exchange Act to extend its coverage to energy commodities such as petroleum products and natural gas.

Prohibits the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) from permitting a foreign board of trade to provide its members or other participants subject to CFTC jurisdiction direct access to its electronic trading and order matching system unless it meets specified requirements.

Authorizes the CFTC to require recordkeeping by any person either located within the United States or entering trades directly into the trade matching system of a foreign board of trade from the United States.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Subjects such persons to liability for violation of CFTC rules and regulations.

Directs the CFTC to convene a working group of international regulators to develop uniform international reporting and regulatory standards to ensure protection of energy futures markets from nonlegitimate hedge trading, excessive speculation, manipulation, location shopping, and lowest common denominator regulation, each of which poses systemic risks to all energy futures markets, countries, and consumers.

Defines "legitimate hedge trading" as transactions by commercial producers and purchasers of actual physical petroleum and energy commodities for future delivery and the direct counterparties to such trades.

Directs the CFTC to review oversight actions regarding all energy futures market participants or market activity in order to ensure that: (1) legitimate hedge trading is protected and promoted; and (2) excessive speculation is eliminated.

Requires the CFTC to set maximum speculative position limits on nonlegitimate hedge trading.

Instructs the CFTC to convene an advisory group to recommend an appropriate level for position limits designed for traders or entities that are not legitimate hedge traders.

Authorizes the CFTC to exercise oversight over any disturbance in a commodity market that disrupts its liquidity and price discovery function from accurately reflecting a commodity's supply and demand ("major market disturbance").

Requires the CFTC to identify each large over-the-counter transaction or class of such transactions in order to detect and prevent potential price manipulation of, or excessive speculation in, any contract listed for trading on a registered entity.

Instructs the CFTC to: (1) routinely require detailed reporting from index traders and swap dealers in markets under its jurisdiction; and (2) review the trading practices for index traders in markets under its jurisdiction to ensure that index trading is not adversely impacting the price discovery process.

Requires the CFTC to disaggregate and make public monthly: (1) the number of positions and total value of index funds and other passive, long-only positions in energy markets; and (2) data on speculative positions relative to bona fide physical hedgers in energy markets.

Directs the CFTC to appoint additional CFTC employees for enforcement purposes.

Establishes a Working Group on Energy Markets to: (1) identify the factors that affect the pricing of crude oil and refined petroleum products, including market speculation; and (2) assess the roles, missions, and structures of relevant federal agencies, interagency coordination, and the gaps that need to be filled for federal oversight and regulation of markets critical to energy security.

Amends the Department of Energy Organization Act to require each federal agency head to provide information to the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration for identification of each energy-producing company.

Establishes within such Administration a Financial Market Analysis Office responsible for financial analysis of energy markets.

Directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to investigate and report to certain congressional committees on the role of financial institutions in natural gas markets.

Directs the Comptroller General of the United States to study and report to certain congressional committees on: (1) the international regime for regulating the trading of energy commodity futures and derivatives; and (2) the effects of noncommercial speculators upon energy futures markets and energy prices.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Reid, Harry [D-NV] · D–NV

Committees

    17 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Motion by Senator Reid to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the measure was not invoked (Record Vote Number 184) entered in Senate. (consideration: CR S7436)

    2. Cloture on the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 43. Record Vote Number: 184. (consideration: CR S7435-7436; text: CR S7435)

      Senate roll call 184 · Individual votes
    3. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S7435-7436)

    4. Motion by Senator Reid to commit to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry with instructions to report back forthwith, wtih the following amendment [SA 5100] made in Senate. (consideration: CR S7130; text: CR S7130)

    5. Cloture motion on the measure presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S7130; text: CR S7130)

    6. Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S7129-7130)

    7. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

    8. Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S7095-7111, S7112-7124, S7124-7129)

    9. Star Print ordered on the measure as reported.

    10. Cloture invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 94 - 0. Record Vote Number: 183. (consideration: CR S6993; text: CR S6993)

      Senate roll call 183 · Individual votes
    11. Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S6985-6997, S6997-7010, S7011-7024)

    12. Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S6952-6953, S6954-6960)

    13. Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S6918; text: CR S6918)

    14. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (consideration: CR S6880; text: CR S6880)

    15. Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 882.

    16. Introduced in the Senate. Ordered read the first time Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. (text of measure as introduced: CR S6725-6729)

    17. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Aug 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.3268 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.3268 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.3268 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.3268 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources