PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.An errata sheet on written report No. 115-348 was printed.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 25, 2018
Waterfront Community Revitalization and Resiliency Act of 2018
This bill directs the Department of Commerce to (1) designate certain communities with plans to develop their waterfronts as "resilient waterfront communities," and (2) create a network among such communities to facilitate the sharing of best practices. Commerce may also use existing authorities to assist communities in developing or implementing such waterfront plans.
People & committees
Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI] · D–WI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
An errata sheet on written report No. 115-348 was printed.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 638.
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Thune without amendment. With written report No. 115-348.
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Thune without amendment. With written report No. 115-348.
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3265 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3265 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3265 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3265 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.