PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Empowering Citizens Act

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 14, 2016

Empowering Citizens Act

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) to revise the public financing system for presidential primary and general elections occurring after January 1, 2018, and to establish a system of public financing of congressional elections.

With respect to presidential primary elections, the bill:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

increases the amount of matching payments from a one-to-one to a six-to-one match for contributions by individuals of $200 or less;

limits aggregate contributions to publicly-financed candidates to $1,000;

establishes a $300 million limit on payments to publicly-financed candidates;

requires primary candidates to certify that they have received matching contributions exceeding $25,000 (currently, $5,000) in each of 20 states, based on individual contributions not exceeding $200;

prohibits a candidate and the candidate's authorized committee from accepting bundled contributions;

requires publicly-financed candidates nominated for the office of President to apply for and accept payments under the general election financing system; and

eliminates the expenditure limitation for candidates under the FECA.

With respect to presidential general elections, the bill:

revises eligibility requirements for public financing of general election candidates;

prohibits general election candidates and their authorized committees from accepting bundled contributions;

sets forth requirements for the use of qualified campaign contributions by candidates and their authorized committees;

eliminates the expenditure limitation for candidates under the FECA;

increases the amount of matching payments to from a one-to-one to a six-to-one match for contributions by individuals giving $200 or less;

limits aggregate contributions to publicly-financed candidates to $1,000;

establishes a $300 million limit on payments to publicly-financed candidates; and

establishes an uniform date for the release of payments to candidates.

The bill establishes a system for public financing of congressional elections and sets forth eligibility requirements for participating candidates. Contributions made to a publicly-financed candidate for the House of Representatives which do not exceed $1,000 are excluded in determining the limit on coordinated expenditures by a national committee of a political party.

The bill amends the FECA to prohibit federal candidates or office holders from soliciting, receiving, directing, or transferring funds to or on behalf of any political committee that accepts donations or contributions that do not comply with FECA limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements (Super PACs), or to or on behalf of any Section 527 organization which accepts such donations or contributions (other than a committee of a state or local political party or a candidate for election for state or local office).

The bill: (1) increases to $100 million the limit on coordinated expenditures for publicly-financed presidential candidates by a national committee of a political party; (2) increases the tax return check-off amount to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund; (3) prohibits an authorized committee of a candidate from establishing or participating in a joint fundraising committee; (4) expands reporting requirements for the disclosure of bundled contributions; and (5) sets forth new requirements for judicial review of campaign finance laws and FEC actions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Udall, Tom [D-NM] · D–NM

Committees

  • Rules and Administration Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.

    2. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.3250 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.3250 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.3250 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.3250 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources