PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Federal Buildings Personnel Training Act of 2010

Became Public Law No: 111-308.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 14, 2010

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Federal Buildings Personnel Training Act of 2010 - Directs the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to: (1) identify, annually, the core competencies necessary for federal personnel performing building operations and maintenance, energy management, safety, and design functions to comply with requirements under federal law, including competencies relating to sustainability, water efficiency, electrical safety, and building performance measures; and (2) identify a course, certification, degree, license, or registration to demonstrate, and for ongoing training in, each core competency for the appropriate category of personnel. Requires individuals in each category to demonstrate each core competency identified for the category within one year.

Directs the Administrator: (1) to develop or identify comprehensive continuing education courses to ensure the operation of federal buildings in accordance with industry best practices and standards; and (2) and the Secretary of Energy to develop, annually, a recommended curriculum relating to facility management and the operation of high-performance buildings.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Makes training requirements under this Act applicable to non-federal personnel performing building operations and maintenance, energy management, safety, and design functions under contract with a federal agency. Requires a contractor to provide training to, and certify the demonstration of core competencies for, non-federal personnel in a manner that is approved by the Administrator.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Carper, Thomas R. [D-DE] · D–DE

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Environment and Public Works Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 111-308.

  2. Became Public Law No: 111-308.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Cleared for White House.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7826)

  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7826)

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 3250.

  12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7826-7829)

  13. Mr. Carnahan moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  16. Received in the House.

  17. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6036; text as passed Senate: CR S6036)

  18. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S6036; text as passed Senate: CR S6036)

  19. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 437.

  20. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Boxer without amendment. With written report No. 111-212.

  21. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Boxer without amendment. With written report No. 111-212.

  22. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  23. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text of measure as introduced: CR S2591-2592)

  24. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2590-2591)

  25. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.3250 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.3250 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.3250 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.3250 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources