PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 28, 1999
Childproof Handgun Act of 1999 - Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a licensed manufacturer, importer, or dealer from selling, delivering, or transferring a handgun to anyone other than a licensed manufacturer, importer, or dealer, unless the handgun is childproof. Defines "childproof" as a handgun that incorporates within its design and as part of its original manufacture technology that: (1) automatically limits the operational use of the handgun; (2) is not capable of being readily deactivated; and (3) ensures that the handgun may only be fired by an authorized or recognized user. Makes exceptions for: (1) the manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States, a State, or a Federal, State, or local government department or agency of a handgun or the transfer to, or possession by, a law enforcement officer of a handgun for law enforcement purposes (whether on or off-duty); and (2) the transfer to, or possession by, a certified or commissioned rail police officer of a handgun for law enforcement purposes. Prohibits a licensed manufacturer, importer, or dealer from selling, delivering, or transferring a handgun to any person: (1) other than a licensed manufacturer, importer, or dealer, unless the transferee is provided with a locking device for that handgun; and (2) unless the handgun is accompanied by a specified warning on a label affixed to the gun and on a separate sheet within the packaging, regarding proper locking and storage, penalties, and possession by minors, with the above exceptions. Sets penalties for failure to provide for childproof handguns and for locking devices and warnings. Directs the Attorney General to make grants to applicants that submit an application that meets specified requirements to reduce violence caused by firearms through the improvement of firearm safety technology, weapon detection technology, or other technology. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Sen. Lautenberg, Frank R. [D-NJ] · D–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1078)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.319 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.319 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.319 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.319 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.