PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

CyberTipline Modernization Act of 2018

Became Public Law No: 115-395.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 21, 2018

CyberTipline Modernization Act of 2018 (Sec. 2) This bill revises reporting requirements for electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers (providers) who report information to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) on crimes involving the sexual exploitation of children.

Currently, providers must report the facts and circumstances of incidents of apparent child pornography, of which they become aware, to NCMEC via the CyberTipline. This bill retains the existing reporting requirement and provides new authority for providers to also report the facts and circumstances that indicate a child pornography violation is imminent.

Additionally, it makes various procedural changes to the reporting requirements, including to do the following:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

grant discretion to providers to determine what information to include in a report;

permit (currently, require) the Department of Justice (DOJ) to designate foreign law enforcement agencies to receive CyberTipline reports from NCMEC;

allow NCMEC to forward a report to a foreign law enforcement agency in certain circumstances, even if the foreign law enforcement agency has not been designated by DOJ; and

provide explicit permission for a provider to disclose the contents of a report, including visual depictions, to law enforcement agencies, to NCMEC, or as necessary to respond to legal process.

Finally, the bill revises and updates various statutory references, including to replace references to “images” with “visual depictions” to make reporting requirements applicable to videos, in addition to images.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX] · R–TX

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
12 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 115-395.

  2. Became Public Law No: 115-395.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H10153-10155)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H10153-10155)

  10. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H10153-10155)

  11. Committee on the Judiciary discharged.

  12. Committee on the Judiciary discharged.

  13. Mr. Goodlatte asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  16. Received in the House.

  17. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  18. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6364)

  20. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 582.

  21. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report.

  22. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report.

  23. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  24. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S4738-4740)

  25. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.3170 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.3170 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.3170 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.3170 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources