PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 555.
Congressional Research Service
Version 80 · Reported to Senate without amendment · Jul 12, 2016
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Stolen Identity Refund Fraud Prevention Act
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to establish requirements and authorities for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) related to: (1) preventing identify theft and tax refund fraud, and (2) the electronic filing of tax returns.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
With respect to identity theft and tax refund fraud, the IRS must:
develop and implement guidelines for stolen identity refund fraud cases,
provide specified notifications and materials to suspected victims of identity theft,
examine certain statements and returns for evidence of employment-related identity theft, and
establish procedures to ensure that taxpayers are not penalized for the underreporting of income due to identity theft.
The bill also increases civil and criminal penalties associated with identify theft, permits the IRS to transfer funds between accounts to combat tax fraud, and reinstates streamlined critical pay authority for certain IRS information technology positions.
The bill amends title II (Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) of the Social Security Act to: (1) require the Social Security Administration to annually request certain information from the IRS to ensure the accuracy of records regarding wages and self-employment income, and (2) permit the IRS to access the Department of Health and Human Service's National Directory of New Hires for the purpose of identifying and preventing fraudulent tax return filings and claims for refunds.
The IRS and the Government Accountability Office must submit to Congress specified reports regarding identify theft and tax refund fraud.
With respect to the electronic filing of returns, the IRS must:
establish a program to issue identity protection personal identification numbers to any individual after the individual's identity has been verified,
establish an Internet platform for Form 1099 filings,
require electronically prepared paper returns to include a scannable code for converting the form to an electronic format, and
verify the identity of individuals opening an e-Services account.
The bill also expands the authority of the IRS to require certain taxpayers to file electronic returns.
People & committees
Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 555.
Committee on Finance. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Hatch. With written report No. 114-299. Additional views filed.
Committee on Finance. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Hatch. With written report No. 114-299. Additional views filed.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3157 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3157 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3157 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3157 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.