PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Domestic Energy Security Improvement Act of 2000

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 21, 2000

Domestic Energy Security Improvement Act of 2000 - Title I: Oil and Gas Incentives - Subtitle A: Production from Marginal and Inactive Wells - Marginal Well Preservation Act of 2000 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) to establish a tax credit for producing oil and gas from domestic marginal wells.Excludes from gross income any income attributable to independent producer oil from a recovered inactive well.Subtitle B: Other Incentives - Permits a taxpayer to elect to expense: (1) geological and geophysical expenditures; and (2) delay rental payments incurred in connection with oil and gas development.Extends: (1) the time period applicable to the special rule for spudding of oil or gas wells; and (2) the enhanced oil recovery credit to certain nontertiary recovery methods.Title II: Strategic Petroleum Reserve - Amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to authorize the Secretary of Energy to draw down and distribute the Strategic Petroleum Reserve at market price whenever the President determines that the market price of crude oil exceeds a specified market price and that a drawdown of the SPR would be in the best interest of the United States.Authorizes appropriations.Title III: Weatherization Program - Amends the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 to repeal the cost-sharing requirement presently incumbent upon States participating in the weatherization assistance grant program.Title IV: Alternative Fuels - Amends the IRC to prescribe guidelines for the allocation of the small ethanol producer credit to patrons of certain cooperative organizations.Title V: Qualified Electric Vehicles - Amends the IRC to modify guidelines governing credit for qualified electric vehicles.Title VI: Wind Production Tax Credit - Amends the IRC to extend the wind production tax credit to a qualified facility placed in service before July 1, 2004 (currently, before January 1, 2002).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Conrad, Kent [D-ND] · D–ND

Committees

  • Finance Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

    2. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.3092 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.3092 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.3092 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.3092 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources