PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

American Innovation and Competitiveness Act

Became Public Law No: 114-329.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 22, 2016

American Innovation and Competitiveness Act

This bill calls on the National Science Foundation (NSF) to maintain the intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria as the basis for evaluating grant proposals in the merit review process.

The NSF shall issue and periodically update policy guidance for both NSF staff and other NSF merit review process participants, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability of the outcomes made through such process.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill renames the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research as the Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) and revises program requirements.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) shall: (1) research information systems for future cybersecurity needs; and (2) develop a process to research and identify, or if necessary, develop cryptography standards and guidelines for future cybersecurity needs, including quantum-resistant cryptography standards.

The bill renames the National High Performance Computing Program as the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program and revises program requirements.

The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) shall define and coordinate federal research in high-energy physics.

NIST shall implement a comprehensive strategic plan for laboratory programs expanding interactions with academia, international researchers, and industry, and commercial and industrial applications.

The NSF shall:

evaluate the existing and future needs, across all NSF-supported disciplines, for mid-scale projects; and

strengthen oversight and accountability over the full life-cycle of large-scale research facility projects; and

continue to review its efforts to sustain scientific efforts in the face of logistical challenges for the U.S. Antarctic Program.

The Department of Commerce Office of Security shall directly manage NIST's law enforcement and security programs through an assigned Director of Security for NIST.

The Office of Management and Budget shall establish an interagency working group to reduce administrative burdens of federally funded researchers while protecting the public's interest in the transparency of, and accountability for, federally funded activities.

The NSF, the Department of Education, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) shall establish the STEM Education Advisory Panel to advise the NSTC Committee on STEM Education on matters related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

The NSF shall award grants to:

increase the participation of women and underrepresented groups in STEM fields,

for research to advance the engagement of students in grades kindergarten through 8 in STEM, and

for establishment of at least one Center of Excellence for the collection, maintenance, and dissemination of information to increase the participation of women and groups underrepresented in STEM fields.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology Act is amended to revise requirements for:

NIST's post-doctoral fellowship program, and

the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership.

Federal agencies may use crowdsourcing and voluntary, collaborative citizen science to advance their missions.

The Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish an interagency working group to:

summarize available research and best practices on how to promote diversity and inclusions in STEM fields, and

examine whether barriers exist to promoting diversity and inclusion within federal agencies employing scientists and engineers.

Each federal agency shall recommend to the President how it could expand research opportunities for undergraduate students attending institutions of higher education.

The NSF shall award grants for:

research on computer science education and computational thinking; and

Innovation Corps entrepreneurship and commercialization education, training, and mentoring.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Gardner, Cory [R-CO] · R–CO

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 114-329.

  2. Became Public Law No: 114-329.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On passage Passed without objection. (text of measure as passed: CR H7590-7609)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text of measure as passed: CR H7590-7609)

  10. Mr. Loudermilk asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.

  11. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H7590-7609)

  12. Held at the desk.

  13. Received in the House.

  14. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  15. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  17. The committee substitute withdrawn by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7167)

  18. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7149-7167; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S7149-7167)

  19. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 695.

  20. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Thune with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-389.

  21. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Thune with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 114-389.

  22. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  23. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  24. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.3084 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.3084 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.3084 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.3084 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources