PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 19, 2000
Defective Product Penalty Act of 2000 - Amends the Federal criminal code to establish criminal penalties for the distribution of defective products (products with some flaw that renders them dangerous to human life beyond their reasonable and accepted risk).Sunshine in Litigation Act of 2000 - Amends the Federal judicial code to require a court to enter an order restricting the disclosure of information obtained through discovery, approving a settlement agreement that would restrict the disclosure of such information, or restricting access to civil court records only after finding that: (1) such order would not restrict the disclosure of information relevant to public health or safety; (2) the public interest in the disclosure of potential health or safety hazards is clearly outweighed by the interest of maintaining the confidentiality of such information; and (3) the requested protective order is no broader than necessary to protect the interest in maintaining confidentiality.Amends Federal transportation law to: (1) require motor vehicle or vehicle equipment manufacturers to review and consider vehicle or equipment incident information and notify the Secretary of Transportation upon having reason to believe that a defect or noncompliance may exist; (2) extend the period during which remedies for defects and noncompliance shall be provided by a manufacturer without charge; and (3) increase the civil penalty for violations of certain vehicle and equipment safety violations.
People & committees
Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8762-8763)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3070 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3070 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3070 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3070 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.