PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-449.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 18, 2000
Amends the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to require the District of Columbia government performance and accountability plan to be submitted concurrently with the submission of the District's budget to Congress, beginning with 2001. (Currently, such plan is required to be submitted no later than March 1 of each year, beginning with 1998.)
People & committees
Sen. Voinovich, George V. [R-OH] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-449.
Became Public Law No: 106-449.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H10459)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H10459)
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H10459)
RESERVATION OF OBJECTION - Ms. Millender-McDonald has reserved the right to object.
Mr. Horn asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Committee on Government Reform discharged.
Committee on Government Reform discharged.
Referred to the Subcommittee on District of Columbia.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10114; text: CR S10114)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10114; text: CR S10114)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 918.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Thompson without amendment. With written report No. 106-469.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Thompson without amendment. With written report No. 106-469.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S8658)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8658)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3062 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3062 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3062 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3062 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.