PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-302.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 3, 2002
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Interstate Supervision Act of 2002 - Amends the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 to require the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia to arrange for the supervision of: (1) District of Columbia (DC) offenders on parole (current law), probation, and supervised release who seek to reside in jurisdictions outside DC; and (2) offenders on parole, probation, and supervised release from jurisdictions outside DC who seek to reside in DC. Authorizes the Director to enter into offender supervision agreements, including the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision, with any State or group of States.
People & committees
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL] · D–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-302.
Became Public Law No: 107-302.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR 11/14/2002 H8938-8939)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR 11/14/2002 H8938-8939)
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR 11/14/2002 H8925-9007)
Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Held at the desk.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10960; text as passed Senate: CR S10960)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10960; text as passed Senate: CR S10960)
By Senator Lieberman from Committee on Governmental Affairs filed written report under authority of the order of the Senate of 10/17/2002. Report No. 107-332.
By Senator Lieberman from Committee on Governmental Affairs filed written report under authority of the order of the Senate of 10/17/2002. Report No. 107-332.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 717.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S9908)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9908)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3044 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3044 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3044 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3044 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.