Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 25, 1999
Small Communities Air Service Act of 1999 - Amends Federal aviation law to require the Secretary of Transportation to grant, after receiving a joint application from an air carrier and a community primarily served by a small hub airport or a nonhub airport, an exemption to provide nonstop regional jet air service between the small hub airport or nonhub airport and a high density airport. Prohibits the Secretary from granting an exemption if: (1) granting the exemption would not be in accordance with established principles of safety; or (2) the exemption would violate the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Sets forth specified conditions and requirements with respect to the exemption. (Sec. 3) Directs the Secretary to study, and report the results to specified congressional committees, the efficacy of a program of Federal loan guarantees for the purchase of regional jets by commuter air carriers to improve jet aircraft service to underserved markets. (Sec. 4) Directs the Secretary, in order to improve security at U.S. public airports, to carry out at least one project to test and evaluate innovative airport security systems and related technology. Makes the Federal share of costs 100 percent. Authorizes appropriations. (Sec. 5) Authorizes appropriations for the Federal Contract Tower Program. (Sec. 6) Directs the Secretary to report to specified congressional committees on efforts by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to implement capacity enhancements and improvements, such as precision runway monitoring systems, and the time frame for their implementation. (Sec. 7) Authorizes a small community or a consortia of small communities or a State to develop an assessment of its air service requirements and submit such assessment and service proposal to the Secretary. Sets forth specified criteria for the selection of participants in the communities program. Directs the Secretary to invite specified air carriers and regional-commuter carriers to offer service proposals in response to, or in conjunction with, the community aircraft service assessments. Sets forth certain program requirements. Directs the Secretary to establish a four-year pilot program: (1) to assist communities and States with inadequate access to the national transportation system to improve their access to such system; and (2) to facilitate better air service link-ups to support the improved access. Directs the Administrator of the FAA, in order to facilitate the use of and improve the safety at small airports, to establish a pilot program to contract for Level I air traffic control services at 20 facilities not eligible for participation in the Federal Contract Tower Program. Sets forth program requirements. Authorizes appropriations.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.304 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.304 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.304 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.304 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.