PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Assistance for International Malaria Control Act

Became Public Law No: 106-570.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 27, 2000

International Malaria Control Act of 2000 - Directs the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) to undertake activities designed to control malaria in recipient countries by coordinating: (1) with appropriate Federal officials and appropriate organizations to develop and implement, in partnership with recipient nations, a comprehensive malaria prevention and control program; and (2) malaria prevention and control activities with efforts by recipient nations to prevent and control HIV and tuberculosis. Authorizes appropriations.Directs the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development to take appropriate steps to provide recipient countries with information concerning: (1) the development of vaccines and therapeutic agents for HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis; and (2) participation in, and the results of, clinical trials conducted by U.S. Government agencies for such vaccines and therapeutic agents.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Helms, Jesse [R-NC] · R–NC

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
  • Foreign Relations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 106-570.

    2. Became Public Law No: 106-570.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendments Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H12504-12508; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H12504-12508)

    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendments Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H12504-12508; text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H12504-12508)

    10. Mr. Gilman asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendments.

    11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    12. Senate agreed to House amendment to the title by Unanimous Consent.

    13. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to House amendment to the title by Unanimous Consent.

    14. Senate concurred to House amendment with an amendment numbered SA 4364 by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11802-11805)

    15. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate concurred to House amendment with an amendment numbered SA 4364 by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11802-11805)

    16. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate bill.

    17. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

    18. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    19. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 385 - 2 (Roll no. 564). (consideration: CR H11399; text: CR 10/26/2000 H11297-11300)

      House roll call 564 · Individual votes
    20. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 385 - 2 (Roll no. 564).(consideration: CR H11399; text: CR 10/26/2000 H11297-11300)

      House roll call 564 · Individual votes
    21. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Ms. Lee objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed until Oct. 27. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

    22. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 2943.

    23. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11297-11302)

    24. Mr. Gilman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    25. Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.

    26. Received in the House.

    27. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    28. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10840; text: CR S10840)

    29. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10840; text: CR S10840)

    30. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 728.

    31. Committee on Foreign Relations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Helms. Without written report.

    32. Committee on Foreign Relations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Helms. Without written report.

    33. Introduced in Senate

    34. Committee on Foreign Relations ordered to be reported an original measure.

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2943 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2943 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2943 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2943 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources