PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Deterrence and Victims Support Act of 2010

Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Sep 22, 2010

Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Deterrence and Victims Support Act of 2010 - Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) the Attorney General should implement changes to the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database to ensure that a child entered into the database will be automatically designated as an endangered juvenile if the child has been reported missing not less than three times in a one-year period, that the NCIC database is programmed to cross-reference newly entered reports with historical records, and that such database is programmed to include a visual cue on the record of a child designated as an endangered juvenile; (2) funds awarded under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program should be used to provide education, training, deterrence, and prevention programs relating to sex trafficking of minors; (3) states should treat minor victims of sex trafficking as crime victims rather than as criminal defendants or juvenile delinquents, adopt and amend laws that protect minors who are victims of sex trafficking, and make such minors eligible for compensation; and (4) demand for commercial sex with sex trafficking victims must be deterred through consistent law enforcement.

Amends the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005 to revise the grant program to combat trafficking in persons to authorize the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs to award block grants to up to six state or local governments in different regions of the United States to combat sex trafficking. Requires at least one of such block grants to be awarded to an entity with a state population of less than 5 million. Specifies authorized uses of grant funds, including providing shelter to minor victims of trafficking, case management services, mental health counseling, legal services, and outreach and education programs to provide information about deterrence and prevention of sex trafficking of minors. Requires the Inspector General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to conduct an audit in FY2012 and FY2013 of all six grantees awarded block grants. Authorizes appropriations for FY2012-FY2014.

Amends the Crime Control Act of 1990 to require: (1) the Attorney General's annual statistical summary under such Act to include the total number of missing child reports received and the total number of entries made to the NCIC database; and (2) state law enforcement agencies to update the record of a missing child with a photograph taken within the previous 180 days and to notify the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children of each report of a child missing from a foster care family home or childcare institution.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Amends the Trafficking Victims Reauthorization Act of 2008 to require the inclusion of safe harbor provisions for children exploited through prostitution in model state antitrafficking statutes.

Directs the United States Sentencing Commission to review and amend federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements to ensure that such guidelines provide an additional penalty for sex trafficking of children and other child abuse crimes.

Amends the federal criminal code to: (1) expand protection of minor victims and witnesses from harassment or intimidation; (2) impose a minimum one-year prison term for possession of certain child pornography; and (3) allow the issuance of an administrative subpoena for the investigation of unregistered sex offenders by the U.S. Marshals Service.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR] · D–OR

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Budget Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Ways and Means Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8893-8896)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8893-8896)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 2925.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8893-8901)

  7. Mr. Scott (VA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  8. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

  9. Referred to House Budget

  10. Referred to House Oversight and Government Reform

  11. Referred to House Ways and Means

  12. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  13. Referred to House Judiciary

  14. Received in the House.

  15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  16. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S8696-8700)

  17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S8696-8700)

  18. The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8692-8701; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S8692-8696)

  20. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 581.

  21. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  22. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  23. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  24. Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law. Hearings held.

  25. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S13788-13790)

  26. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S13788)

  27. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2925 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2925 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2925 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2925 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources