PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 3, 1993
Permits within Glacier Bay National Park in Alaska: (1) subsistence fishing and gathering by local residents; and (2) commercial fishing as practiced between 1980 and 1981 within the nonwilderness marine waters of such Park. Directs the Secretary of the Interior to develop, notify specified congressional committees of completion of, and promulgate regulations for enforcing a plan to determine to what extent commercial fishing in such nonwilderness marine waters of the Park should be permitted. Limits the annual average commercial fishing effort in such waters in a specified area. Allows the Secretary to further restrict such commercial fishing when necessary. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK] · R–AK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.
Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1180-1181)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.291 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.291 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.291 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.291 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.