Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (consideration: CR S7945-7946)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 1, 2002
Rank and File Stock Option Act of 2002 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce the deduction allowed for granting stock options if the total number of shares in a firm which may be acquired by highly compensated employees pursuant to options exceeds 50 percent of the aggregate share amount. Negates the deduction if: (1) the total number of shares which may be acquired by one highly compensated employee pursuant to options exceeds five percent of the aggregate share amount; or (2) the total number of shares available to covered employees pursuant to options exceeds 15 percent of the aggregate share amount. Allows an exception to the negation provisions if a taxpayer grants an equal number of identical options to every employee. Counts all members of an affiliated group of corporations as one taxpayer.Directs the Securities and Exchange Commission to finalize rules pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to ensure that: (1) shareholder approval is required for stock option plans and grants and other equity interests; and (2) prior to submission of such plans to shareholders for approval, detailed information about the plans is given.Authorizes shareholder approval rules to exempt from the shareholder approval provisions of this Act: (1) certain stock option grants to individual employees; and (2) stock option plans and grants issued by small businesses or by additional small issuers as approved by the Commission.Directs the Commission to conduct an analysis of, and make regulatory and legislative recommendations on, the need for new stock holding period requirements for senior executives.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2877 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2877 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2877 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2877 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.