PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Small Business Innovation Protection Act of 2016

By Senator Vitter from Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship filed written report under authority of the order of the Senate of 12/10/2016. Report No. 114-419.

Official summary

Version 80 · Reported to Senate without amendment · May 24, 2016

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary has been expanded because action occurred on the measure.)

Small Business Innovation Protection Act of 2016

(Sec. 4) This bill directs the Small Business Administration to develop partnership agreements that arrange for:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

development of high-quality training for small businesses related to domestic and international protection of intellectual property,

leveraging of training materials already developed for the education of inventors and small businesses, and

participation of a nongovernmental organization.

These agreements must also arrange for training:

through electronic resources, including Internet-based webinars, and at physical locations, including a small business development center; and

the headquarters or a regional office of the United States Patent and Trade Office.

(Sec. 5) The bill amends the Small Business Act to require services at a small business development center to include training in person or through a website relating to:

domestic and international intellectual property protections, and

how those protections should be considered in the business plans and growth strategies of small businesses.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI] · D–MI

Committees

  • Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. By Senator Vitter from Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship filed written report under authority of the order of the Senate of 12/10/2016. Report No. 114-419.

  2. By Senator Vitter from Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship filed written report under authority of the order of the Senate of 12/10/2016. Report No. 114-419.

  3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 483.

  4. Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Reported by Senator Vitter without amendment. Without written report.

  5. Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Reported by Senator Vitter without amendment. Without written report.

  6. Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  7. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

  8. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2846 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2846 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2846 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2846 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources