A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 424 South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the "John Brademas Post Office".
Held at the desk.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 28, 2000
Redesignates the Postal Service facility located at 424 South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the John Brademas Post Office.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10112-10113; text: CR S10113)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10112-10113; text: CR S10113)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 881.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Thompson under authority of the order of the Senate of 09/28/2000 without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Thompson under authority of the order of the Senate of 09/28/2000 without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on referred to Subcommittee on International Security, Proliferation and Federal Services.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S6015-6016)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2804 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2804 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2804 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2804 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.