PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 26, 2000
Glacier National Park Rehabilitation and Enhancement Act of 2000 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to complete a feasibility study for the rehabilitation of Going-to-the-Sun Road located in Glacier National Park, Montana. Authorizes appropriations.Instructs the Secretary to prepare an impact mitigation plan in connection with any adverse economic impact to local communities resulting from rehabilitation of the Road. Authorizes appropriations.Directs the Secretary to complete a Commercial Services Plan for the Park to assess the provision of commercial services in the Park.Authorizes the Secretary to competitively lease to any person a lodging facility in the Park that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, subject to specified conditions.Directs the Secretary to: (1) provide necessary assistance to the National Trust for Historic Preservation and other entities seeking to restore tour buses used in the Park; (2) enter into partnerships with local educational institutions to facilitate the development of skills needed for employment opportunities in and around the Park; (3) evaluate the use of designated training programs; and (4) conduct an assessment to determine Glacier National Park Resources and needs; (5) construct a new visitor center; and (6) continue to maintain and improve Park utility systems.Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Sen. Baucus, Max [D-MT] · D–MT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.2786 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.2786 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.2786 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.2786 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.