PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to provide for the transfer or other disposition of certain lands at Melrose Air Force Range, New Mexico, and Yakima Training Center, Washington.

Held at the desk.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 5, 2000

Transfers administrative jurisdiction over the surface estate of specified public lands at Melrose Air Force Range, New Mexico, from the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to the Secretary of the Air Force. Withdraws the mineral estate of such lands from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral and geothermal leasing laws, but not the Materials Act of 1947. Allows the Secretary of the Air Force to use, without application to the Secretary, the sand, gravel, or similar mineral material resources on such lands when required for construction needs on the Range.Transfers administrative jurisdiction over the surface estate of specified public lands at Yakima Training Center, Washington, from the Secretary to the Secretary of the Army. Sets forth similar withdrawal and use requirements.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM] · R–NM

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Held at the desk.

    2. Received in the House.

    3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    4. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9975-9976, S9986-9987; text: CR S9986-9987)

    5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9975-9976, S9986-9987; text: CR S9986-9987)

    6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 897.

    7. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with amendments. With written report No. 106-451. (text of measure as reported in Senate: CR 10/5/2000 S9986)

    8. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with amendments. With written report No. 106-451.(text of measure as reported in Senate: CR 10/5/2000 S9986)

    9. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

    10. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Committee consideration held.

    11. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text of measure as introduced: CR S5464-5465)

    12. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5464)

    13. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2757 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2757 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2757 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2757 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources