PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 114-253.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 8, 2016
(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on September 26, 2016. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
This bill designates the federal building and U.S. courthouse located at 300 Fannin Street in Shreveport, Louisiana, as the "Tom Stagg United States Court House."
People & committees
Sen. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA] · R–LA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 114-253.
Became Public Law No: 114-253.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to the House amendments to the Senate bill by Unanimous Consent.
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendments to the Senate bill by Unanimous Consent.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6493-6495; text as passed Senate: CR S6493-6495)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate bill.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5885)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5885)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 2754.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5885)
Mr. Davis, Rodney moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Held at the desk.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5867-5868; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S5867; text as passed Senate: CR S5867-5868)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5867-5868; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S5867; text as passed Senate: CR S5867-5868)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 471.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Inhofe with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Inhofe with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.2754 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.2754 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.2754 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.2754 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.