White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 10, 2002
White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002 - Amends the Federal criminal code to increase penalties for: (1) conspiracy to commit an offense against, or to defraud, the United States; and (2) mail and wire fraud.Amends the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 to increase criminal penalties for violations of such Act.Directs the United States Sentencing Commission to review the Federal sentencing guidelines and related policy statements to: (1) ensure that they reflect the serious nature of the offenses and penalties set forth in this Act, the growing incidence of serious fraud offenses, and the need to deter, prevent, and punish such offenses; and (2) consider whether a specific offense characteristic should be added in order to provide stronger penalties for fraud committed by a corporate officer or director.Requires that each periodic report containing financial statements filed by an issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission be accompanied by a written statement by the chairman of the board, chief executive officer, and chief financial officer certifying: (1) the appropriateness of the financial statements and disclosures; and (2) that those financial statements and disclosures fairly present the operations and financial condition of the user.Sets penalties of: (1) up to $500,000 and five years imprisonment for recklessly and knowingly violating this Act; and (2) up to $1,000,000 and ten years imprisonment for willfully violating this Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2717 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2717 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2717 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2717 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.