Law Enforcement and Public Safety Telecommunications Empowerment Act
Committee on Commerce. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-434.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 4, 1997
Law Enforcement and Public Safety Telecommunications Empowerment Act - Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from issuing new broadcast station licenses in the spectrum between 746 and 806 megahertz after the date of enactment of this Act. Directs the FCC to allocate and assign 24 megahertz of such spectrum for law enforcement and public safety uses, and 36 megahertz for commercial uses. Directs the FCC to transfer the right to assign such allocated spectrum to the Public Safety Telecommunications Institute (established later under this Act). Establishes in the Treasury an account for proceeds received from the auction of such spectrum to commercial users. Authorizes the Institute to retain ten percent of such proceeds (with minimum and maximum limits) for use in funding State and local law enforcement and public safety agencies' mission-related radio communications capabilities. Requires proportionate distribution of account funds among States. Repeals a provision of the Act which terminates on September 30, 1998, FCC authority to grant broadcasting licenses or permits. Establishes the Public Safety Telecommunications Institute to: (1) auction and assign spectrum in accordance with the Act; (2) award grants and contracts; and (3) certify programs intended to aid and improve State law enforcement and public safety telecommunications systems.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.255 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.255 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.255 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.255 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.