PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Law Enforcement and Public Safety Telecommunications Empowerment Act

Committee on Commerce. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-434.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 4, 1997

Law Enforcement and Public Safety Telecommunications Empowerment Act - Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from issuing new broadcast station licenses in the spectrum between 746 and 806 megahertz after the date of enactment of this Act. Directs the FCC to allocate and assign 24 megahertz of such spectrum for law enforcement and public safety uses, and 36 megahertz for commercial uses. Directs the FCC to transfer the right to assign such allocated spectrum to the Public Safety Telecommunications Institute (established later under this Act). Establishes in the Treasury an account for proceeds received from the auction of such spectrum to commercial users. Authorizes the Institute to retain ten percent of such proceeds (with minimum and maximum limits) for use in funding State and local law enforcement and public safety agencies' mission-related radio communications capabilities. Requires proportionate distribution of account funds among States. Repeals a provision of the Act which terminates on September 30, 1998, FCC authority to grant broadcasting licenses or permits. Establishes the Public Safety Telecommunications Institute to: (1) auction and assign spectrum in accordance with the Act; (2) award grants and contracts; and (3) certify programs intended to aid and improve State law enforcement and public safety telecommunications systems.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Committee on Commerce. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-434.

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S945-946)

  4. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.255 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.255 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.255 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.255 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources