PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003

Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 490.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 13, 2002

Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 - Authorizes appropriations for FY 2003 for the conduct of intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the: (1) Central Intelligence Agency; (2) Department of Defense; (3) Defense Intelligence Agency; (4) National Security Agency; (5) Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; (6) Departments of State, the Treasury, and Energy; (7) Federal Bureau of Investigation; (8) National Reconnaissance Office; (9) National Imagery and Mapping Agency; and (10) Coast Guard.Specifies that the amounts authorized and the authorized personnel ceilings as of September 30, 2003, for such activities are those specified in the classified Schedule of Authorizations.Allows the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), with the approval of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to authorize employment of civilian personnel in excess of the number authorized for FY 2003 (by not more than two percent) when necessary to the performance of important intelligence functions.Authorizes appropriations for the Community Management Account of the Director of Central Intelligence for FY 2003 as well as for full-time personnel for elements within such Account. Earmarks a specified amount of such funds for the National Drug Intelligence Center.Authorizes appropriations for FY 2003 for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund.Specifies that the authorization of appropriations by this Act shall not be deemed to constitute authority for the conduct of any intelligence activity which is not otherwise authorized by the Constitution or laws of the United States.Amends the National Security Act of 1947 to require the budget justification materials submitted to Congress for a fiscal year to set forth separate aggregate amounts requested for the National Foreign Intelligence Program for: (1) counterterrorism; (2) counterproliferation; (3) counternarcotics; and (4) counterintelligence.Requires the DCI to establish and maintain a Foreign Terrorist Asset Tracking Center and a Terrorist Identification Classification System.Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002 - Establishes the National Counterintelligence Executive.Establishes the National Commission for the Review of the Research and Development Programs of the United States Intelligence Community.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Graham, Bob [D-FL] · D–FL

Committees

  • Armed Services Committee
  • Intelligence (Select) Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 490.

    2. Senate passed companion measure H.R. 4628 in lieu of this measure by Unanimous Consent.

    3. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 4628 as an amendment.

    4. The bill was read the third time by Unanimous Consent.

    5. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S9350-9351)

    6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 490.

    7. Committee on Armed Services. Reported by Senator Levin with amendments. With written report No. 107-208.

    8. Committee on Armed Services. Reported by Senator Levin with amendments. With written report No. 107-208.

    9. Committee on Armed Services. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

    10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services pursuant to Section 3(b) of S.Res. 400, 94th Congress for a period of not to exceed 30 days of session.

    11. Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Graham. With written report No. 107-149.

    12. Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Graham. With written report No. 107-149.

    13. Introduced in Senate

    14. Committee on Intelligence ordered to be reported an original measure.

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2506 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2506 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2506 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2506 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources