PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

African Conflict Resolution Act

Became Public Law No: 103-381.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 29, 1994

African Conflict Resolution Act - Authorizes the President to provide assistance to: (1) strengthen the conflict resolution capabilities of the Organization of African Unity and subregional organizations established by countries in Subsaharan Africa; (2) nongovernmental organizations engaged in mediation and reconciliation efforts in Africa; and (3) provide for demobilizations of armed forces in Subsaharan African countries and for the reintegration of demobilized military personnel into civilian society. Earmarks funds for such purposes from foreign assistance funds allocated for Subsaharan Africa. Permits the President to establish a program to provide education and training in conflict resolution and peacekeeping for civilian and military personnel of countries in Subsaharan Africa. Earmarks funding for such program. Declares that the President should develop an integrated, long-term plan to provide support for the enhancement of conflict resolution capabilities and demobilization activities in Subsaharan Africa.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Pell, Claiborne [D-RI] · D–RI

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 103-381.

    2. Became Public Law No: 103-381.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. By Senator Pell from Committee on Foreign Relations filed written report. Report No. 103-404.

    8. By Senator Pell from Committee on Foreign Relations filed written report. Report No. 103-404.

    9. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    10. On passage Passed without objection.

    11. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

    12. Mr. Johnston asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.

    13. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H10970-10972)

    14. Held at the desk.

    15. Received in the House.

    16. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    17. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S14077-14079)

    18. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S14077-14079)

    19. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 694.

    20. Committee on Foreign Relations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Pell. Without written report.

    21. Committee on Foreign Relations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Pell. Without written report.

    22. Committee on Foreign Relations ordered to be reported an original measure.

    23. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2475 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2475 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2475 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2475 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources