Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 576.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 14, 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Defense and Security Assistance Subtitle A: Transfers of Excess Defense Articles Subtitle B: Foreign Military Sales Authorities Subtitle C: Stockpiling of Defense Articles for Foreign Countries Subtitle D: Miscellaneous Provisions Title II: Transfer of Naval Vessels to Certain Foreign Countries Security Assistance Act of 1998 - Title I: Defense and Security Assistance - Subtitle A: Transfers of Excess Defense Articles - Amends Federal law to extend through FY 2000 Department of Defense (DOD) authority to transfer excess defense articles to countries eligible to participate in the Partnership for Peace program and eligible for assistance under the Support for East European Democracy (SEED) Act of 1989. (Sec. 102) Authorizes for FY 1999 and 2000 the use of funds made available to DOD for crating, packing, handling, and transportation of excess defense articles to Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. Subtitle B: Foreign Military Sales Authorities - Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to extend assistance to countries for foreign military training programs under the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) for up to eight months from the program termination date for necessary expenses of winding up program related activities. (Sec. 112) Amends AECA to authorize the sale of excess Coast Guard defense articles and defense services to eligible foreign countries and international organizations. (Sec. 113) Applies certain numbered congressional certification requirements with respect to the upgrade of major defense articles, equipment, or services to their direct commercial sale as well. (Sec. 114) Requires certain numbered certifications to the Congress with respect to any letter of offer to sell (Government-to- Government sale), or license for export (commercial sale) of, major defense equipment in the amount of $14 million or more, or defense articles or services in the amount of $50 million or more, to include a description of any offset agreement, including its dollar amount. (Sec. 115) Extends to exports of defense articles or services the current prohibition against incentive payments by U.S. suppliers to satisfy any offset agreement with a foreign country to which such articles or services are sold. Subtitle C: Stockpiling of Defense Articles for Foreign Countries - Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to increase the maximum value of additions to stockpiles in foreign countries in FY 1999. Makes amounts available for such stockpiles in South Korea and Thailand. (Sec. 122) Authorizes the President to transfer to South Korea and Thailand certain obsolete or surplus defense articles in return for concessions to be negotiated by the Secretary of Defense. Requires the value of such concessions to be at least equal to the fair market value of the transferred items. Requires the President to notify the Congress of the proposed transfer, including the identity of the items to be transferred and the concessions to be received. Terminates transfer authority five years after enactment of this Act. Subtitle D: Miscellaneous Provisions - Prohibits armed forces or other security forces of a foreign country that is ineligible for international military education and training (IMET), or for which such assistance is restricted, from receiving IMET under any other provision of law, unless: (1) certain congressional committees are notified at least 15 days in advance of such training; (2) the foreign country is a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or major non- NATO ally; (3) the foreign country is Austria, Finland, South Korea, Singapore, or Spain (high-income foreign countries); (4) the training is related to an operation undertaken to save the lives or property of U.S. citizens; or (5) the training is reportable under title V of the National Security Act of 1947. Directs the Secretary of State to report to specified congressional committees on measures taken to ensure that all IMET activities are conducted in accordance with U.S. foreign policy objectives. (Sec. 132) Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to revise requirements for the President's annual military assistance report to Congress. Requires such report to include by category: (1) whether defense articles were furnished with the financial assistance of the U.S. Government, including through loans and guarantees; and (2) the provision of law pursuant to which any IMET activities were conducted. Title II: Transfer of Naval Vessels to Certain Foreign Countries - Authorizes the President to transfer certain naval vessels to: (1) Argentina; (2) Brazil; (3) Mexico; (4) Taiwan; (5) Portugal; (6) Philippines; (7) Chile; and (8) Venezuela. (Sec. 202) Directs the President to certify to specified congressional committees that any transfer of guided missile destroyers or frigates to Greece or Turkey is consistent with the objective of ensuring a stable and peaceful atmosphere in the eastern Mediterranean region. Authorizes the President to transfer certain naval guided missile destroyers and frigates to such countries. (Sec. 203) Declares that the value of certain naval vessels transferred on a grant basis to foreign countries shall not be included with regard to certain limits placed on the aggregate value of excess defense articles that can be transferred to such countries. (Sec. 205) Authorizes the President, with respect to the transfer of naval vessels on a lease-sale basis, to transfer such vessels under the terms of the lease (with lease payments suspended for the term of the lease), if the country to which the vessel is to be leased simultaneously enters into a foreign military sales agreement for the transfer of title to the leased vessel. (Sec. 206) Authorizes the President to convert to foreign military sales certain previous leases of frigate class and tank landing class vessels to foreign countries. (Sec. 206) Authorizes the President to consent to the retransfer by the Government of Greece of HS Rodos (ex-U.S.S. Bowman County (LST 391)) to the USS LST Ship Memorial, Inc. Sets forth specified conditions for the granting of the consent.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2463 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2463 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2463 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2463 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.