PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2000

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 13, 2000

King and Tsiorvas Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2000 - Directs the Secretary of Transportation to: (1) implement the oil and gas pipeline safety improvement recommendations provided for in the Department of Transportation (DOT) Inspector General's Report (RT-2000-069); and (2) report every 90 days to specified congressional committees on the specific actions taken to implement them. Requires the DOT Inspector General to assess periodically for the same committees the Secretary's progress in doing so.(Sec. 3) Directs the Secretary, the Administrator of Research and Special Program Administration, and the Director of the Office of Pipeline Safety to: (1) comply fully with certain Federal transportation law requirements to ensure timely responsiveness to National Transportation Safety Board recommendations about pipeline safety; (2) make a copy of each recommendation on pipeline safety and response available to the public at reasonable cost; and (3) report annually to Congress on each pipeline safety recommendation made by the Board during the prior year, and a copy of the response to each such recommendation.(Sec. 4) Requires each pipeline operator to submit to the Secretary a training plan designed to enhance training (and periodic retraining) for pipeline personnel and reduce the likelihood of accidents and injuries. Requires the plan to include criteria to demonstrate an individual's ability to safely and properly perform assigned tasks. Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) review the submitted plans, initially and on a continuing basis, to determine if they are sufficient to provide a safe operating environment; and (2) establish minimum standards for operators to include in such plans.(Sec. 5) Requires the Secretary to issue regulations requiring pipeline operators to: (1) periodically determine the adequacy of pipelines to operate safely in unusually sensitive areas and high-density population areas; and (2) perform periodic inspections or tests capable of identifying corrosion, mechanical damage, or other structural or operational defects that could be detrimental to safety and the environment.(Sec. 6) Amends Federal transportation law to grant shutdown authority to the Secretary to take necessary action to prevent the operation for 30 days (including additional 30-day periods) of any hazardous liquid or natural gas pipeline whose continuing operation creates an imminent safety hazard to persons, property, or the environment.(Sec. 7) Revises the public education program requirements for gas pipeline facility owners or operators. Applies such requirements to owners or operators of a hazardous liquid pipeline facility. Includes among the items for public education: (1) damage prevention activities in addition to the use of a one-call notification system before excavation; (2) the physical indications that an unintended release may have occurred; (3) what steps should be taken for public safety in the event of a pipeline release; (4) how to report such an event; and (5) activities to advise municipalities, school districts, businesses, and residents of pipeline facility locations. Repeals the specific requirement of education on the importance of reporting gas odors to the appropriate authority. Requires submission to and review of such programs by the Secretary. Requires pipeline facility owners and operators to review their public education programs annually and make necessary revisions. Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) issue standards prescribing the elements of an effective public education program; and (2) provide technical assistance to the pipeline industry on developing public safety and public education program content and best practices for program delivery, and on evaluating program effectiveness.Requires an operator of a gas transmission or hazardous liquid pipeline facility to initiate and maintain liaison with the State emergency response commissions, and local emergency planning committees (or local fire, police, and other emergency response agencies in the absence of a committee) in the areas of pipeline right-of-way, established under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 in each State in which it operates. Requires the operator, when requested, to make specified information available to such State emergency response commissions and local emergency planning committees.Requires the owner or operator of each gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facility to provide annually to the governing body of each municipality in which the pipeline facility is located a map identifying the facility's location.Requires the Secretary to make available to the public any safety-related condition report and any report of a pipeline incident filed by an operator.(Sec. 8) Increases from $25,000 to $100,000 the civil penalty for each facility operator failure to: (1) mark accurately the location of pipeline facilities in the vicinity of a demolition, excavation, tunneling, or construction; or (2) comply with safety standards, prepare and carry out an inspection and maintenance plan, allow access to records, or allow required entries or inspections. Increases the maximum civil penalty for a related series of violations to $1 million.(Sec. 9) Authorizes the Secretary, if a State pipeline safety program certification is accepted, to make an agreement with a State authority authorizing it to participate in the oversight of interstate pipeline transportation, including a plan for the State authority to participate in special investigations involving new construction or incidents, as well as (subject to specified requirements) other activities overseeing interstate pipeline transportation that supplement the Secretary's program and address issues of local concern.Allows the Secretary to end an agreement for the oversight of interstate pipeline transportation when significant gaps are found in the State authority's regulatory authority over intrastate pipeline transportation, or when the State authority's continued participation in the oversight of interstate pipeline transportation: (1) is found inconsistent with the Secretary's program; (2) would adversely affect oversight of intrastate pipeline transportation; or (3) the State is not promoting activities that enable communities to live safely with pipelines.(Sec. 10) Directs the Secretary to develop and implement a comprehensive plan for the collection and use of gas and hazardous liquid pipeline data to revise the causal categories on the accident report forms to eliminate overlapping and confusing categories and include subcategories. Requires the plan to include components to provide the capability to perform sound accident trend analysis and evaluations of pipeline operator performance using normalized accident data.(Sec. 11) Requires the Secretary, as part of the DOT research and development program, to direct research attention to the development of alternative technologies: (1) to expand the defect detection capabilities of internal inspection devices; (2) to inspect pipelines that cannot accommodate internal inspection devices available on the date of enactment; and (3) to develop innovative techniques measuring the structural integrity of pipelines.(Sec. 12) Authorizes appropriations with respect to gas and hazardous liquid and State grants. Requires the transfer of specified amounts from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund to carry out authorized programs.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  2. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 232 - 158 (Roll no. 519). (text: CR H9548-9553)

    House roll call 519 · Individual votes
  3. Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 232 - 158 (Roll no. 519).(text: CR H9548-9553)

    House roll call 519 · Individual votes
  4. Considered as unfinished business.

  5. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Oberstar objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

  6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 2438.

  7. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9548-9562, H9573-9574)

  8. Mr. Shuster moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  9. Held at the desk.

  10. Received in the House.

  11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  12. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S8236-8241)

  13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S8236-8241)

  14. The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8225-8241;text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S8225-8230)

  16. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 763.

  17. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator McCain under authority of the order of the Senate of 07/26/2000 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 106-387. Additional views filed.

  18. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator McCain under authority of the order of the Senate of 07/26/2000 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 106-387. Additional views filed.

  19. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  20. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  21. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2757-2758)

  22. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2438 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2438 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2438 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2438 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources