Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 12, 2000
Predatory Lending Deterrence Act - Amends the Truth in Lending Act with respect to certain credit transactions secured by the consumer's principal dwelling (high-cost mortgage) to revise prescriptions governing the annual percentage rate and total points and fees.(Sec. 4) Sets forth proscriptions and limitations governing high cost home loans including: (1) a proscription against balloon payments; (2) a proscription against a repayment schedule whose regular periodic payments do not cover the full amount of interest due (causing the principal balance to increase); (3) a proscription against prepaid payments; (4) mandatory creditor consideration of debtor's repayment ability; (5) restrictions on creditor's payments under home improvement contracts; (6) a proscription against creditor's sole discretion to accelerate debt repayment; (7) a proscription against modification or deferral fees; (8) a proscription against financing of fees or charges; and (9) a proscription against creditor's benefit from refinancing an existing loan with a new loan.(Sec. 6) Sets forth additional requirements and limitations for all mortgages, including prohibiting a residential mortgage transaction creditor from: (1) imposing a penalty for prepayment of all or part of the principal; (2) encouraging default on a prior debt or applying a higher post default interest rate mortgage; and (3) financing insurance premiums under the residential mortgage transaction extension of credit.(Sec. 7) Subjects violations of this Act to certain penalties of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and to the authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Subjects certain creditor violations to Federal Trade Commission Act penalties with respect to unfair or deceptive practices.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2405 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2405 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2405 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2405 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.