A bill to amend the Service Members Occupational Conversion and Training Act of 1992 to permit a period of training under the Act of more than 18 months, and for other purposes.
Committee on Veterans. Hearings held.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 12, 1994
Amends the Service Members Occupational Conversion and Training Act of 1992 to eliminate the 18-month limit on the period of training (but not the limit on the amount of subsidy). Provides that certain standards for wages and benefits refer to other employees and training programs in the same community during the entire program period of the eligible person. Provides that the amount of the wage subsidy payment to the employer on behalf of the eligible person may not exceed the number of hours equivalent to 18 months of training. Revises provisions relating to entry into the program of job training and the time period for disapproval of assistance.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2387 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2387 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2387 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2387 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.