PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to provide for a 5-month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving compensation when the program under such Act ends.

Became Public Law No: 108-1.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 7, 2003

Amends the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (which is title II of the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, PL107-147) to extend the temporary extended unemployment compensation (TEUC) program for five months, through weeks of unemployment ending before June 1, 2003 (currently January 1, 2003).Provides for a transition period of continuing payments to individuals with amounts remaining in their TEUC account after May 31, 2003, for weeks beginning before August 30, 2003.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Fitzgerald, Peter [R-IL] · R–IL

Committees

    18 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 108-1.

    2. Became Public Law No: 108-1.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 416 - 4 (Roll no. 7). (text: CR H75)

      House roll call 7 · Individual votes
    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 416 - 4 (Roll no. 7).(text: CR H75)

      House roll call 7 · Individual votes
    10. On motion to commit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 202 - 224 (Roll no. 6). (consideration: CR H90-91)

      House roll call 6 · Individual votes
    11. The previous question on the motion to commit with instructions was ordered without objection.

    12. Mr. McDermott moved to commit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR H88-91; text: CR H88-89)

    13. Mr. Thomas raised a point of order against the motion to commit with instructions. Mr. Thomas stated that the motion violated section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. Sustained by the Chair.

    14. Mr. McDermott moved to commit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR H86-87; text: CR H86-87)

    15. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on S. 23.

    17. Rule provides for consideration of S. 23 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Rule providing one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by Representative Thomas of California and Representative Rangel of New York. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. Provides that Section 2 of the resolution provides that the allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of H. Res. 5 may be submitted by Representative Nussle of Iowa. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.

    18. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 14. (consideration: CR H75-92)

    19. Rule H. Res. 14 passed House.

    20. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 14 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S. 23 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Rule providing one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by Representative Thomas of California and Representative Rangel of New York. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. Provides that Section 2 of the resolution provides that the allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of H. Res. 5 may be submitted by Representative Nussle of Iowa. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.

    21. Held at the desk.

    22. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    23. Received in the House.

    24. Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9-15)

    25. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9-15)

    26. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.23 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.23 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.23 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.23 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources