A bill to provide for a 5-month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 and for a transition period for individuals receiving compensation when the program under such Act ends.
Became Public Law No: 108-1.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 7, 2003
Amends the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002 (which is title II of the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, PL107-147) to extend the temporary extended unemployment compensation (TEUC) program for five months, through weeks of unemployment ending before June 1, 2003 (currently January 1, 2003).Provides for a transition period of continuing payments to individuals with amounts remaining in their TEUC account after May 31, 2003, for weeks beginning before August 30, 2003.
The previous question on the motion to commit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Mr. McDermott moved to commit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR H88-91; text: CR H88-89)
Mr. Thomas raised a point of order against the motion to commit with instructions. Mr. Thomas stated that the motion violated section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. Sustained by the Chair.
Mr. McDermott moved to commit with instructions to Ways and Means. (consideration: CR H86-87; text: CR H86-87)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on S. 23.
Rule provides for consideration of S. 23 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Rule providing one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by Representative Thomas of California and Representative Rangel of New York. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. Provides that Section 2 of the resolution provides that the allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of H. Res. 5 may be submitted by Representative Nussle of Iowa. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 14. (consideration: CR H75-92)
Rule H. Res. 14 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 14 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S. 23 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Rule providing one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by Representative Thomas of California and Representative Rangel of New York. Waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. Provides that Section 2 of the resolution provides that the allocations referred to in section 3(a)(4)(B)(i) of H. Res. 5 may be submitted by Representative Nussle of Iowa. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Held at the desk.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9-15)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9-15)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.23 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.23 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.23 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.23 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.