PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

FISA Amendments Act of 2008

See also H.R.3773.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Feb 12, 2008

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008 or FISA Amendments Act of 2008 - Title I: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance - (Sec. 101) Amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) to add a new title concerning additional procedures for acquiring the communications of certain persons outside the United States.

Authorizes the Attorney General (AG) and Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to jointly authorize, for periods up to one year, the targeting (electronic surveillance) of persons located outside the United States in order to acquire foreign intelligence information, under specified limitations, including: (1) prohibiting an acquisition intentionally targeting a person reasonably believed to be outside the United States in order to acquire the communications of a specific person reasonably believed to be located in the United States, unless done in accordance with titles I or III of FISA; and (2) requiring the targeting to be conducted in a manner consistent with the fourth amendment to the Constitution. Requires: (1) certain targeting and minimization procedures to be followed; and (2) prior to such targeting, a certification by the AG and DNI as to the necessity of such targeting and that appropriate procedures will be followed. Allows the AG and DNI, if immediate targeting is determined to be required, to commence such targeting, but to submit the certification within seven days of such determination. Requires all certifications to be submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Court) for review.

Authorizes the AG and DNI to direct an electronic communication service provider to: (1) immediately provide the government with all information, facilities, and assistance necessary to accomplish an acquisition; and (2) maintain under security procedures any records concerning such acquisition. Outlines legal procedures with respect to directive challenges, standards for review, enforcement, and appeals. Provides for: (1) judicial review of certifications and targeting and minimization procedures; and (2) review of Court rulings by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (with certiorari to the Supreme Court). Requires the maintenance and security of records and proceedings with respect to acquisition applications, orders, and determinations.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Requires the AG and DNI, at least every six months, to: (1) assess compliance with required targeting and minimization procedures; and (2) submit assessment results to the Court and the congressional intelligence committees. Authorizes inspectors general of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and elements of the intelligence community (IC) authorized to acquire foreign intelligence information to review their agency or element's compliance with such procedures and provide review results to the AG, DNI, and intelligence committees. Requires the head of any IC element conducting an acquisition of foreign intelligence information to annually review such acquisitions and report review results to the Court, the AG, the DNI, and the intelligence committees.

Provides Court jurisdiction for the targeting of a U.S. person located outside the United States when the acquisition of information is conducted within the United States. Requires an application for such acquisition to be made by a federal officer (and approved by the AG), and to contain certain requirements, including that the target is believed to be a foreign power or agent, officer, or employee of a foreign power. Provides for judicial review of a Court order approving such an acquisition. Makes approval orders effective for 90 days, with authorized 90-day renewals. Allows the AG to authorize an emergency acquisition of such a target under certain circumstances, including: (1) determining that an emergency exists; (2) informing a Court judge of such determination; and (3) applying within seven days for a Court order authorizing such surveillance. Provides similar Court jurisdiction and outlines similar procedures for the acquisition (and emergency acquisition) of a physical search.

Authorizes the: (1) joint applications and concurrent approvals of requests for acquisitions proposed to be conducted both inside and outside the United States; and (2) concurrent authorizations of electronic surveillance and physical searches.

Directs the AG to report semiannually to the intelligence and judiciary committees concerning the implementation of acquisition requirements.

(Sec. 102) States that FISA and the procedures of chapters 119 (Wire and Electronic Communications Interception and Interception of Oral Communications), 121 (Stored Wire and Electronic Communications and Transactional Records Access), and 206 (Pen Registers and Trap and Trace Devices) of the federal criminal code shall be the exclusive means by which electronic surveillance and the interception of domestic wire, oral, or electronic communications may be conducted.

(Sec. 103) Requires the AG to submit semiannually to the intelligence committees copies of any orders of the Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review that include significant construction or interpretation of FISA, including any such orders issued during the five-year period before the enactment of this Act. Allows for the redaction of submitted materials for the protection of national security.

(Sec. 104) Revises provisions concerning the application for, and issuance of, Court orders, including provisions concerning paperwork requirements and government officials who may authorize FISA actions.

(Sec. 105) Allows the AG to authorize the emergency employment of electronic surveillance if the AG, among other things: (1) determines that an emergency exists; (2) informs a Court judge of such determination; and (3) applies for a Court order authorizing such surveillance.

(Sec. 107) Provides similar revisions and outlines similar procedures as in sections 104 and 105 above for the emergency employment of physical searches.

(Sec. 108) Requires the AG, after authorizing the installation and use of a pen register or trap and trace device on an emergency basis, to apply to the Court for an authorization order within seven days (current law requires 48 hours) after the emergency installation and use.

(Sec. 109) Authorizes the Court to sit en banc when: (1) necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of Court decisions; or (2) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.

(Sec. 110) Authorizes the acquisition of foreign intelligence information in order to prevent the international proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Title II: Protections for Electronic Communication Service Providers - (Sec. 202) Prohibits an action against an electronic communication service provider (provider) if the AG certifies to the court involved that the assistance was: (1) in connection with an intelligence activity authorized by the President during the period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on January 17, 2007, and designed to prevent a terrorist attack or related activities against the United States; and (2) described in a written request or directive from the AG or head of an IC element to the provider indicating that the activity was authorized by the President and determined to be lawful. Subjects AG certifications to review for abuse of discretion. Requires the court involved to review in camera and ex parte a declaration by the AG that disclosure of a certification would harm national security.

(Sec. 203) Provides a similar prohibition and certification requirements as above in the case of actions against individuals other than providers furnishing requested assistance to an IC element.

(Sec. 204) Prohibits a state from conducting investigations, imposing sanctions, or commencing or maintaining a civil action or other proceeding against a provider furnishing requested assistance.

Title III: Other Provisions - (Sec. 301) Provides severability protections for this Act and its amendments.

(Sec. 302) Repeals FISA provisions made inconsistent by provisions of this Act. Outlines transition procedures.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Rockefeller, John D., IV [D-WV] · D–WV

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Intelligence (Select) Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. See also H.R.3773.

    2. Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 512.

    3. Senate vitiated previous passage.

    4. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R.3773 as an amendment.

    5. Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 68 - 29. Record Vote Number: 20.

      Senate roll call 20 · Individual votes
    6. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 68 - 29. Record Vote Number: 20.

      Senate roll call 20 · Individual votes
    7. Cloture on the measure invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 69 - 29. Record Vote Number: 19. (consideration: CR S890)

      Senate roll call 19 · Individual votes
    8. The bill was read the third time.

    9. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S880-891, S891-904)

    10. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S827-844, S845)

    11. Cloture motion on the bill presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S813; text: CR S813)

    12. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S805-807)

    13. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S775-778)

    14. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S686-688, S688-692, S697-700, S703, S704-710, S712-714)

    15. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S639-648, S650-655)

    16. Considered by Senate. (CR S564-575, S575-580)

    17. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S535-537)

    18. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S375-388)

    19. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S305-306, S307-310, S310-315, S317-320, S320-322)

    20. Motion to table the committee substitute, as modified, agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 36. Record Vote Number: 2. (consideration: CR S227-256)

      Senate roll call 2 · Individual votes
    21. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S227-265, S266-270, S270-271, S302)

    22. The committee substitute was modified by Unanimous Consent. (text as modified: CR S184-191)

    23. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S179-193; text as reported in Senate: CR S179-184)

    24. By Senator Leahy from Committee on the Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 110-258. Additional and Minority views filed.

    25. By Senator Leahy from Committee on the Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 110-258. Additional and Minority views filed.

    26. Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S15726-15767)

    27. Cloture on the motion to proceed invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 76 - 10. Record Vote Number: 435. (consideration: CR S15726; text: CR S15726)

      Senate roll call 435 · Individual votes
    28. Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S15710-15726)

    29. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate.

    30. Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S15647; text: CR S15647)

    31. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (consideration: CR S15644-15647)

    32. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 512.

    33. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    34. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    35. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    36. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    37. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary pursuant to section 3(b) of S.Res. 400, 94th Congres, as amended by S.Res. 445, 108th Congress, for a period not to exceed 10 days of session.

    38. Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held.

    39. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 453.

    40. Select Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. With written report No. 110-209. Additional and Minority views filed.

    41. Select Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. With written report No. 110-209. Additional and Minority views filed.

    42. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2248 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2248 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2248 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2248 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources