PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3150 Great Northern Avenue in Missoula, Montana, as the "Mike Mansfield Post Office".

Became Public Law No: 108-440.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 3, 2004

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced in the Senate on March 12, 2004. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Designates the U.S. Postal Service facility located at 3150 Great Northern Avenue in Missoula, Montana, as the Mike Mansfield Post Office.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Burns, Conrad R. [R-MT] · R–MT

Committees

  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 108-440.

  2. Became Public Law No: 108-440.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9692)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9692)

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 2214.

  11. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9692-9693)

  12. Mr. Platts moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  13. Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.

  14. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  15. Received in the House.

  16. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6681-6682; text as passed Senate: CR S6681)

  17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S6681-6682; text as passed Senate: CR S6681)

  18. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 547.

  19. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. Without written report.

  20. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. Without written report.

  21. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  22. Referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

  23. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2792)

  24. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2214 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2214 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2214 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2214 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources