PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 28, 1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Tax Incentives for Higher Education Subtitle A: Tax Relief for Higher Education Costs Subtitle B: Encouraging Savings for Higher Education Costs Title II: Scholarships for Academic Achievement Title III: Deficit Neutrality Growing the Economy for Tomorrow: Assuring Higher Education is Affordable and Dependable Act - Title I: Tax Incentives for Higher Education - Subtitle A: Tax Relief for Higher Education Costs - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to provide income tax deductions for qualified higher education expenses and student loan interest. (Sec. 102) Excludes from gross income qualified scholarships and fellowships, including Federal tuition grants requiring future Federal service. (Sec. 103) Makes the employer-provided educational assistance income exclusion permanent. Repeals a limitation on graduate-level educational assistance. Subtitle B: Encouraging Savings for Higher Education Costs - Permits the use without penalty of distributions from certain retirement and pension plans to pay higher education expenses. (Sec. 112) Allows a deduction of up to $2,000 per calendar year for contributions to a tax-exempt education savings account for a beneficiary under age 19. Permits non-deductible contributions to such an account as well. Prescribes penalties for the use of distributions for other than qualified educational expenses. (Sec. 113) Increases from $40, 000 ($60,000 for a joint return) to $70,000 ($100,000 for a joint return) the income limits for full exclusion from gross income of any income from U.S. savings bonds used to higher education tuition and fees. Title II: Scholarships for Academic Achievement - Authorizes the Secretary of Education to award $1,000 scholarships to secondary school students graduating in the top five percent of their class, subject to family income limits. Allows such students to receive a maximum of two such scholarships for use at any institution of higher education during any four academic years. Authorizes appropriations. Title III: Deficit Neutrality - Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) this Act will be deficit neutral; and (2) its costs should be paid by closing corporate loopholes.
People & committees
Sen. Biden, Joseph R., Jr. [D-DE] · D–DE
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S747-749)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.218 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.218 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.218 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.218 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.