Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Act of 2004
Held at the desk.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Sep 15, 2004
Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Act of 2004 - Establishes the Lewis and Clark National Historical Park in the States of Washington and Oregon as a unit of the National Park System.
Requires the Secretary of the Interior, subject to valid rights (including withdrawals), to transfer to the Director of the National Park Service management of any Federal land at Cape Disappointment, Washington, that is within the boundary of the Park.
Revokes withdrawals of the 20-acre parcel depicted on the map as "Memorial to Thomas Jefferson." Directs the Secretary to establish a memorial to Thomas Jefferson.
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9351; text as passed Senate: CR 9/20/2004 S9390-9391)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9351; text as passed Senate: CR 9/20/2004 S9390-9391)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 678.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici under authority of the order of the Senate of 07/22/04 with amendments. With written report No. 108-322.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici under authority of the order of the Senate of 07/22/04 with amendments. With written report No. 108-322.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 108-626.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2167 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2167 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2167 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2167 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.