PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Excellent Schools for All Our Children Act

Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1120-1121)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 2, 2000

Excellent Schools for All Our Children Act - Title I: Funding for Elementary and Secondary Education - Requires the Secretary of Education to make direct awards to local educational agencies (LEAs) to support programs or activities, for kindergarten through grade 12 students, deemed appropriate by the LEAs.(Sec. 103) Bases award amounts on LEA's average daily attendance relative to that of such students in all States for the preceding year.(Sec. 104) Requires any failing LEA, which is classified as unaccredited or failing under performance-based standards by its State educational agency (SEA), to use such an award only for purposes directly related to improving elementary and secondary school students' academic performance consistent with specified provisions.Requires any funds provided to a failing LEA under title I (Helping Disadvantaged Children Meet High Standards) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to be spent in accordance with this Act. Makes inapplicable to a failing LEA certain provisions of title I of ESEA, other than specified allocation and allotment provisions.Requires failing LEAs to submit to the Secretary plans that: (1) describe the activities to be funded under this Act consistent with specified requirements; and (2) may request an exemption from the uses of funds restrictions under such requirements for schools served by the failing LEA that met SEA performance-based accreditation or categorization standards for the previous fiscal year. Requires failing LEAs, upon the Secretary's approval of their plans, to widely disseminate such plans throughout the area they serve and to post their plans on the Internet.Permits each failing LEA to use the direct award provided under this Act and the funds provided under title I of ESEA, for the fiscal year of the approved plan, only to: (1) recruit, retain, and reward high-quality teachers; (2) focus on teaching basic educational skills; (3) provide remedial instruction in core academic subjects assessed by SEA or LEA standards; (4) fund mentoring programs for elementary and secondary school students needing assistance in reading, writing, or arithmetic; (5) use proven methods of instruction, such as phonics, based upon reliable research; (6) provide for extended day learning; (7) ensure that parents realize they play a significant role in their child's educational success, and encourage parents to become active in their child's education; and (8) provide any other activity that an LEA proposes, and the Secretary approves, as one that relates directly to improving students' academic performance.Requires failing LEAs to submit annual reports to the Secretary on their use of funds and the annual performance of all their children as measured by their SEA standards. Requires individual student privacy protections in, and wide dissemination and Internet posting of, such reports.Makes such requirements for failing LEAs inapplicable to any such LEA if it meets SEA standards for two consecutive fiscal years after it is required to use funds in accordance with such requirements. Allows such an LEA to receive a bonus award from specified funds, to use for purposes such as providing professional development opportunities to, and otherwise rewarding, teachers and principals who improved student performance. Provides that the LEA shall determine how to distribute such bonus award to individual elementary and secondary schools, and that a school receiving such an award shall determine how it will be spent. Authorizes appropriations for such bonus awards.Penalizes failing LEAs for improper use of funds under this Act.(Sec. 105) Authorizes audits and enforcement of certain sanctions to ensure proper use of funds under this Act.(Sec. 106) Authorizes appropriations to carry out this title. Directs the Secretary to use such funds appropriated for each fiscal year to continue to make payments to eligible recipients pursuant to any multiyear award made prior to the date of enactment of this Act under certain provisions of law repealed under this Act.(Sec. 107) Repeals: (1) specified ESEA provisions for demonstration project grants to improve student achievement; (2) specified ESEA provisions for school technology resource grants; (3) title VI (Innovative Education Program Strategies) of ESEA; (4) part C (Emergency Immigrant Education Program)of title VII of ESEA; (5) part A (Fund for the Improvement of Education) of title X of ESEA; (6) title III (State and Local Education Systemic Improvement) of the Goals 2000: Educate America Act (G2000EAA); (7) title IV (Parental Assistance) of G2000EAA; (8) the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994; (9) subtitle B (Education for Homeless Children and Youth) of title VII of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act; and (10) specified provisions for funds to reduce class size in elementary and secondary schools, and alternative uses of such funds, under the Department of Education Appropriations Act, 1999.Title II: Good Student Scholarships - Amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to direct the Secretary to award achievement-based college scholarships to students graduating from failing or unaccredited schools or school districts (Good Student Scholarships program).(Sec. 201) Makes eligible for such a scholarship any secondary school student who: (1) graduates from a public secondary school or a public or private secondary school in a school district that is failing or unaccredited, as determined by the SEA; (2) has been in attendance at that school for at least two years; (3) ranks in the top ten percent academically in such student's class; (4) has an average ACT or SAT score that is equal to or greater than the national average; and (5) is in a family with income not more than $100,000.Makes each such award equal to the maximum appropriated Federal Pell Grant for such year.Authorizes appropriations for the Good Student Scholarships program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Ashcroft, John [R-MO] · R–MO

Committees

  • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1120-1121)

    2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1119-1120)

    3. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2159 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2159 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2159 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2159 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources