National Bone Marrow Registry Reauthorization Act of 1998
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 9, 1998
National Bone Marrow Registry Reauthorization Act of 1998 - Amends the Public Health Service Act to: (1) declare that the purpose of the National Bone Marrow Registry is to increase the number of transplants for recipients suitably matched to biologically unrelated bone marrow donors; (2) revise the membership and tenure of the Registry's board of directors; and (3) revise the Registry's functions. Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ensure that the Registry develops, evaluates and implements a plan to: (1) effectuate efficiencies in the relationship between the Registry and donor centers; and (2) incorporate the findings and recommendations of the Bone Marrow Program Inspection conducted as of January 1997 by the Office of the Inspector General. Requires the Registry to: (1) implement a bone marrow donors recruitment program to identify populations underrepresented among potential Registry donors; (2) establish an office of patient advocacy, which shall provide individualized case management services directly to the patient; and (3) report annually to the Secretary on pretransplant costs. Directs the Secretary (acting through the Registry) to establish a scientific registry of information relating to recipients of bone marrow transplants from a biologically unrelated donor. Authorizes appropriations. Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to the Congress on the Registry, covering specified questions, including the extent to which the Registry has increased the representation of racial and ethnic minority groups among potential donors.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.2150 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.2150 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.2150 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.2150 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.