PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 109-325.
Congressional Research Service
Version 80 · Reported to Senate without amendment · Jul 21, 2006
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary has been expanded because action occurred on the measure.)
Extends the authority, for an additional four years, for relocation expenses test programs for federal employees. Eliminates the limitation on the period of time under which payment of relocation expenses under such programs may be paid.
Makes this Act effective as though enacted as part of the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998.
People & committees
Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME] · R–ME
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 109-325.
Became Public Law No: 109-325.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7738)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7738)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 2146.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7738-7739)
Mr. Westmoreland moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8552; text as passed Senate: CR S8552)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8552; text as passed Senate: CR S8552)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 528.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. With written report No. 109-289.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. With written report No. 109-289.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.2146 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.2146 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.2146 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.2146 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.