PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 27, 1996
Amends the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Act to direct the Attorney General to establish guidelines for State programs that require a person who is: (1) convicted of a criminal offense against a minor or of a sexually violent offense to register a current address; or (2) a sexually violent predator to register a current address unless such requirement is terminated under specified circumstances or pursuant to an assessment for purposes of a sentencing enhancement determination. Includes within the definition of "sexually violent predator" a person convicted of a sexually violent offense who has received an enhanced sentence based on a determination that the person is a serious danger to others due to a gravely abnormal mental condition. Revises Act registration provisions to require a State prison officer, or in the case of probation, the court: (1) if a person required to register is released from prison or placed on parole, supervised release, or probation, to inform the person that he or she must report any change of residence address as provided by State law and comply with any registration requirement in the new State of residence; and (2) to forward the registration information to the agency responsible for registration under State law. Modifies Act requirements to: (1) require that State procedures provide for verification of address at least annually; (2) require that a change of address by a person required to register be reported to law enforcement authorities in the manner provided by State law; (3) require such person who moves to another State to report the change of address to the responsible agency in the State he or she is leaving and to comply with any registration requirement in the new State of residence; and (4) authorize the State or any agency authorized by the State to release relevant information necessary to protect the public, subject to specified limitations.
People & committees
Sen. Gregg, Judd [R-NH] · R–NH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.2138 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.2138 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.2138 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.2138 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.