PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Perkins County Rural Water System Act of 1998

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 22, 1998

Perkins County Rural Water System Act of 1997 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to make grants to the Perkins County Rural Water System, Inc., for the Federal share of the costs of: (1) planning and construction of the System; and (2) repairs to existing public water distribution systems to ensure conservation of resources and to make such systems functional under the new System. Prohibits the obligation of System construction funds until: (1) Federal environmental compliance requirements have been met; (2) a final System engineering report has been prepared and submitted to the Congress for at least a 90-day period; and (3) a water conservation program has been developed and implemented. Requires the water conservation program to be designed to ensure that System water users will use the best practicable technology and management techniques to conserve water use. Requires the mitigation of fish and wildlife losses during System construction and operation. Directs the Western Area Power Administration to make available, from power produced under the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program, the capacity and energy required to meet the pumping and incidental operational requirements of the System from May 1 to October 31 of each year. Provides power use conditions. States that this Act does not limit: (1) the authorization for water projects in North and South Dakota under any law; or (2) current water rights. Provides the Federal share (75 percent) of System costs. Authorizes the Secretary to provide construction oversight to a specified service area within the System, limiting oversight costs. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Johnson, Tim [D-SD] · D–SD

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  2. Senate agreed the House amendment with an amendment (SP 3842) by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S12974-12978)

  3. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed the House amendment with an amendment (SP 3842) by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S12974-12978)

  4. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.

  5. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

  6. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  7. On passage Passed without objection.

  8. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

  9. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H10589-10594)

  10. Committee on Resources discharged.

  11. Committee on Resources discharged.

  12. Mr. Hansen asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.

  13. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  14. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  15. Received in the House.

  16. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.

  17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.

  18. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S11825-11828)

  19. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-368.

  20. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-368.

  21. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 621.

  22. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with amendments. Without written report.

  23. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with amendments. Without written report.

  24. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  25. Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands. Hearings held.

  26. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.

  27. Referred to Subcommittee on Water and Power.

  28. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  29. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5445-5446)

  30. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2117 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2117 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2117 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2117 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources