PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to address the participation of Taiwan in the World Health Organization.

Became Public Law No: 108-235.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jun 14, 2004

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on April 29, 2004. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Authorizes the Secretary of State to: (1) initiate, and instruct the U.S. delegation to implement, a plan to endorse and obtain observer status for Taiwan at the annual World Health Assembly summit in May 2004 in Geneva, Switzerland; and (2) introduce a resolution in support of observer status for Taiwan at such summit. Directs the Secretary to report no later than April 1 of each year on the U.S. plan to obtain observer status for Taiwan at such annual World Health Assembly summit.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Allen, George [R-VA] · R–VA

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
13 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 108-235.

  2. Became Public Law No: 108-235.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR 5/21/2004 H3457-3458)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR 5/21/2004 H3457-3458)

  10. Mr. DeLay asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.

  11. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR 5/21/2004 H3457-3458)

  12. Held at the desk.

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House. (consideration: CR S5021-5022; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S5021-5022)

  14. Received in the House.

  15. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  17. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 492.

  18. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Lugar with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  19. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Lugar with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  20. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  21. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  22. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2092 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2092 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2092 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2092 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources