S.2092 / 104th Congress

A bill to prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Referred to Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands.

S.2092 through Congress

S.2092 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

SenateSep 19, 1996IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No House action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related House measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the House stage of S.2092.

Related House bill: H.R.4120 To prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 19, 1996

Prohibits an extension or establishment of a national monument from being undertaken in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID] · R–ID

Committees

Energy and Natural Resources Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Sen. Kempthorne, Dirk [R-ID]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 20, 1996
Referred to Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands.
Sep 19, 1996
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Sep 19, 1996
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S11033)
Sep 19, 1996
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in Senate · Sep 19, 1996 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 4120 · To prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2092 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2092, 104th Congress: A bill to prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/senate-bill/2092

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1996-09-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/s2092/BILLS-104s2092is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:13:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.2092 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2092 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2092, 104th Congress: A bill to prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/senate-bill/2092

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1996-09-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/s2092/BILLS-104s2092is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:13:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.2092 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2092 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2092, 104th Congress: A bill to prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/senate-bill/2092

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1996-09-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/s2092/BILLS-104s2092is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:13:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.2092 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2092 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2092, 104th Congress: A bill to prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/senate-bill/2092

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 1996-09-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/s2092/BILLS-104s2092is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:13:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.2092 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.